🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.